Have of history, is hiding it.

 I just tried that search again, and got this, twice: “We” (and who is “we”?) had temporary problems searching for web pages. Search again for sacramento bee nathaniel levine chart jim miller Prop. 64 soros 2016 or type a new query above.
    Soros is desperate to hide his links to Prop. 64, because he’s still hoping to hide the REAL goal of Prop. 64, and it’s not just “legalizing marijuana.” It’s about who has the right to control industrial hemp as a crop worth TRILLIONS of dollars.

    Yes, the reason that Soros is funding Prop. 64 is the same the reason he’s been funding Obama, the same reason he’s been funding Hillary, the same reason he could NOT allow Bernie Sanders to be the nominee, the same reason our government is pushing the TPP down our throats.  

      It’s a little item barely mentioned in Prop. 64, so you won’t think it’s important — just like these Robber Barons did with the Marihuana Stamp Tax Act of 1937. Think Prop. 64 is about marijuana and its use as a drug or medicine? That’s just a sleight of hand trick to distract everyone.

     It’s really about hemp, industrial hemp. The crop that was worth a billion annually in 1937, and which is now worth TRILLIONS.

On Sunday, August 28, 2016 9:33 AM, “letitiaepepper@yahoo.com” <letitiaepepper@yahoo.com> wrote

    A yahoo search this morning with these terms “sacramento bee nathaniel levine chart jim miller Prop. 64 soros” failed to turn up the chart released by in the Sacramento bee about Soros being behind Prop. 64 funding.  

     Why do you think that is? That’s how I found it on Saturday . . . .

 Inline image

     A new search “California proposition 64 sacramento bee The proposition 64 paper trail” also failed to turn up that paper trail chart or ANY article about Prop. 64, just a lot of “Yes on Prop. 64” hits.  

    Coincidence? Or a sign of ALL the money George Monsantosoros is pouring into this campaign? Let’s make him PAY DEARLY for any win in California; better yet, let’s make him pay.

Monsanto and Soros Really ARE Behind Prop. 64, and It’s WAR; Chris Conrad and Bill Panzer, Mercenaries; UTRCs Are Worse that UTIs

   Here is a chart that shows who is actually funding Prop. 64, prepared by reporters at the Sacramento Bee. http://media.sacbee.com/static/newsroom/graphicsembeds/prop64/prop64.html?nocache=1050
      Notice that familiar, evil face in the left lower corner of the above chart from the Sacramento Bee? Can it be — no, not really? Yes, it’s George Soros, a major shareholder in Monsanto. This chart (thanks, Nathaniel Levine and Jim Miller of the Sacramento Bee!) should put a hole in the boat that Chris Conrad and Bill Panzer are trying to float to “prove” that Ellen Brown’s two-part article about the link between Prop. 64 and Soros and Monsanto is wrong. See WEB OF DEBT BLOG on WordPress.com
WEB OF DEBT BLOG on WordPress.com

ARTICLES IN THE NEWS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COMMENTS, FEEDBACK, IDEAS

   Monsanto actually contacted Ms. Brown and told her that it was not developing GMO cannabis. Sure. You just know that you can trust Monsanto not to lie.  
    If someone had actually published something untrue about Monsanto, its lawyers would have been serving her with papers as fast as you can say “Round-Up is NOT carcinogenic, so shut up!” They would not be calling to say, “you’re wrong, and no,we’re not lying.”  

George Soros – TruthWiki
George Soros – TruthWiki

The man who “broke the Bank of England” on Black Wednesday in 1992 is one of the top thirty richest people in th…
    These interlocking corporations and interlinked boards of directors are how these evil doers try to disguise their campaign contributions, and it’s also how they try to hide their corporate goals.

     Not long ago, Scotts Miracle-Gro, “a convicted corporate criminal that sells low-end fertilizers,” (ouch! that quote, used in several online publications, must hurt) including Monsanto’s carcinogenic Round-Up, used its wholly-owned subsidiary “Hawthorne Gardening Company,” (doesn’t that name sound bucolic and healthy?) to try to hide what it was up to. Using Hawthorne, Scotts bought General Hydroponics, a General Hydroponics’ affiliate “Bio-Organic Solutions” that markets under the Vermicrop name, plus the Dutch lighting company, “Gavita,” and Botanicae, a company that makes hydroponics nutrients. (See a pattern here? I used to have to unravel this kind of corporate name-knot at work for state and federal judges. Thank god other people are doing this, too.) 

        But it gets better. Guess with whom Scotts Miracle-Grow has expanded its partnership? Which I think explains very nicely why it acquired all those indoor marijuana growing products, and why Prop. 64 is written to force people to grow marijuana indoors, using expensive products and way too much electricity. Just guess. 

     Yes. Monsanto. Monsanto and Scotts Miracle-Gro Expand Long-Standing Partnership | Monsanto Newsroom
Monsanto and Scotts Miracle-Gro Expand Long-Standing Partnership | Monsanto…

ST. LOUIS–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Monsanto Company (NYSE: MON) and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (NYSE: SMG), the lea…

Scotts Miracle-Gro Buys General Hydroponics
Scotts Miracle-Gro Buys General Hydroponics

Hydroponics nutrients manufacturer General Hydroponics has been purchased by a subsidiary of Scotts Miracle-Gro.

    These proud capitalists are cheerfully willing to ruin millions of people’s lives, and send hundreds of thousand of people to prison and jail, just to make MORE MONEY. Because it’s not just California they’re after. They got Washington, they tried to get Ohio, and we’re next.  

    As the guy in charge of Scott’s said about the lawn and garden business compared to warfare, “Oh, dude, in a lot of ways, I think it’s better. Today the way wars happen, you don’t get to keep all the stuff. To me this is one where in commercial combat you kind of rape and pillage, and you keep all of the stuff.” Cannabis Capitalist: Scotts Miracle-Gro CEO Bets Big On Pot Growers
Cannabis Capitalist: Scotts Miracle-Gro CEO Bets Big On Pot Growers

By Dan Alexander

Scotts Miracle-Gro’ controversial CEO, Jim Hagedorn, is gambling $400 million to reach a burgeoning market o…
    I really, truly hope this A**HOLE did not serve in any military unit for the US, because of this attitude. Sounds like he would have raped and pillaged if he had a chance, would just regret not being allowed to keep of the booty, like loot and severed ears, doesn’t it?

     In fact, the war to control California cannabis is warfare. There are no rules against lying, cheating, hacking, etc. And we’ve seen it all, with more to come, since the enemies are the Electronic Robber Barons. 

    The profiteers behind Prop. 64 are doing all those things.Wars are fought with dis-information and Fifth Columnists, and they are all here — and have been here and visible since Prop. 19. This Sacramento Bee-created chart therefore is very timely; just in time to make life a little more difficult for Chris Conrad and Bill Panzer, both masters of dis-information. They were just planning to release an article “proving” that Monsanto has no connection with Prop. 64, and that Ellen Brown, like me, is crazy. 

    Stay tuned for more reinforcements for the No on Prop. 64 team. Dragonfly de la Luz will be releasing a series of articles to address Chris Conrad’s “legal-lies,” with the first one is already available and out soon.

      The reason Prop.19 lost was the grassroots activists; the people who are poor and not being paid by Mnsanot and Soros. We can defeat Prop. 64, too, if we all fight back. So post this information everywhere. Put it on flyers and hand out at events. Tell people in the grocery store. The pro-AUMA/Prop. 64 folks will be taking down Facebook posts, memes, Tweets, anything that can be controlled and co-opted electronically. The people controlling Facebook, Windows, smart phones, Diebold voting machines (what a BAD idea for democracy) managed healthcare and more are all part of the Electronic Robber Baron Club, and they help each other. Read the Wiki article to see who funded Obama’s AND Hillary’s campaigns and see why they both do and WILL support the TPP. Prop. 64 is like the TTP for California.

     

          And don’t forget: while UTIs are bad, UTRCs are worse;

        you can’t get rid of them with a prescription of Cephalexin.  

              So don’t get a UTRC in the first place; vote NO ON PROP. 64

Report on Letitia Pepper’s False Arrest in West Hollywood on 08/20/2016, at the Hands of a Pro-AUMA Minion

     Here is a brief report on Letitia Pepper’s recent false arrest in West Hollywood on August 20, 2016.    The City of West Hollywood co-sponsored a “Cannabis Education Forum,” an event which was a thinly disguised pro-AUMA/Prop. 64 event. It was open to the public, free, and took place on City-owned property on Aug. 20, 2016.  

      Amanda Hyde, its organizer and the 2015 founder of CEF (Cannabis Educational Forum), carefully arranged the event so that there would not be any full and frank discussion of Prop. 64 and its actual impacts on citizens and businesses. Ms. Hyde’s expertise in cannabis education is unknown, she is, reportedly, an aesthetician.

    The City’s decision to turn this event over to Ms. Hyde might be based on the fact that its City Council was somehow persuaded to endorse Prop. 64. Previously, such well-respected activists as Richard Eastman and Patrick Moore, who have encyclopedic knowledge of cannabis, both hemp and marijuana, had been involved in the City’s annual cannabis event, but not now, not that Prop. 64 is being pushed, not when Eastman and Moore are actively campaigning against Prop. 64, and not now that five elected City officials are also pushing Prop. 64.

    The Prop. 64 bias was all too apparent. For example, Lynne Lyman, president of the ,which has endorsed Prop. 64, and who is somehow related to Dr. Donald Lyman, M.D., its legal proponent who sees marijuana as a dangerous and addictive drug. “Is marijuana bad for your health? ‘Yes,’ says Dr. Donald Lyman of Sacramento, a retired physician and former board member of the California Medical Assn. “People do not use it to make themselves healthier. They use it to deal with other problems. It is a dangerous and ill-advised substance. That’s why it has to be under control.’ That’s the twist here. Lyman is co-leading a push to qualify a marijuana legalization initiative for the 2016 California ballot. His measure, the doctor says, would control usage, quality and quantity.” ‘Recreational’ marijuana proponents are pushing a false narrative
  

‘Recreational’ marijuana proponents are pushing a false narrative

By Los Angeles Times

The weed warriors are back, peddling pot for the  ballot. And one old tale they’re spinning is pur…

     So, Ms. Lyman, who is helping Dr. Lyman push this POS proposition, had 45 uninterrupted minutes to present an uncontradicted point of view about how great Prop. 64 will be — if people are deceived enough to pass it.
    Letitia Pepper and other activists attended to give out information on Prop. 64 via flyers. Realizing that there was no on AUMA info being distributed, Ms. Hyde first told Ms. Pepper she would have to ask her to leave the event because the flyers had not been pre-approved. No one can require pre-approval of a First Amendment message; that is called prior restraint and it is unconstitutional.   

    When she realized that trying to claim that Pepper was disrupting the meeting also wasn’t gong to work (the meeting in question was over and was in recess when Ms. Hyde asked Ms. Pepper to leave), Ms. Hyde resorted to lies, the common refuge of the pro-AUMA hucksters.

    In order to get Ms. Pepper arrested, Ms. Hyde falsely claimed to sheriffs’ deputies that the 2016 event — co-hosted and paid for by the City of West Hollywood — was a private event, and signed a citizen’s arrest form to have her arrested for trespass after she refused to leave at Ms. Hyde’s request, a request clearly made because she did not approve of Ms. Pepper’s political massage, as contained in the anti-Prop.64 flyers.

     Anyone at a public event, on public property, is not committing a crime and anyone doing it cannot properly be charged with, let alone convicted of, trespass. Only Ms. Hyde’s lie to the deputies about this being a private event — and possibly whatever the City staff put on the event permit — made this arrest possible.
   Lying to law enforcement personnel, and filling out a citizen’s arrest form with false statements in order to have someone falsely arrested, is a crime. 
    So when people like Chris Conrad and their ilk start posting lies about my arrest, please respond with this information. Thanks!
In solidarity, Letitia E. Pepper, Esq. 
   The First Amendment rocks, Prop. 64 sucks Click for link -> 4Pepper

  

Things to considered about Prop64…

    Prop. 64 is not “marijuana legalization.” It is how Big Pharma and Monsanto intend to take over cannabis — both industrial hemp and marijuana. It is 62 pages long, contains a lot of other laws it incorporates by reference without including them in the text so you can read them, and it took me, a trained and experienced attorney, 36 hours to read and understand the whole thing.      It will result in more arrests of both people. It is illegal for anyone under 21 to use or possess marijuana n– even as medicine! Parents who give whole herbal marijuana in any form to children who are sick will be felons. Many people who are sick need need more marijuana, and marijuana in different forms than flowers that are smoked will be prevented from using marijuana as medicine because of all the rules that limit amounts, sources, and self-cultivation.

    It makes it illegal to make your own Rick Simpson Oil to treat cancer — even using food-grade, grain alcohol — because alcohol is a volatile solvent. and Prop. 64 makes it a felony to make concentrates using volatile solvents.

    Big Pharma is bleeding profits as more and more people turn to safer and cheaper marijuana that they or their friends have been able to grow for free or very inexpensively since Prop. 215 passed. That is why Prop. 64 is designed to, and does, repeal Prop. 215. That is why the billionaires behind Big Pharma and Big Ag are backing Prop. 64, which reduces safe and affordable access to marijuana instead of making it easier to get and use! Calling it “marijuana legalization” is designed to make people vote for it without reading it.
New Study Has Big Pharma Terrified — Pot Destroys their Profits

thefreethoughtproject.com › Solutions

Jul 7, 2016 – First Senior Bankers on the Planet Responsible for 2008 Collapse Jailed · Tragic Irony … New Study Has Big Pharma Terrified — As Pot is Legalized, Pill Sales Plummet … Legal marijuana destroys big pharma’s profits.

Big Pharma Pockets $711 Billion in Profits by Robbing Seniors …

mmmpcaregiverservices.lefora.com/…/Big-Pharma-Pockets-711-Billion-Pro…

Apr 25, 2013 – Michigan’s Organic Medical Marijuana Caregiver Services Forum … Big Pharma Pockets $711 Billion in Profits by Robbing Seniors, Taxpayers.

Big Pharma-Produced Cannabis Is Likely Coming to the U.S.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…/medical-cannabis-issue-&#8230;

The Huffington Post

Aug 3, 2015 – Look for the first naturally-derived, Big Pharma-produced cannabis … that haunts this senior observer of the medical cannabis movement is: …

One striking chart shows why pharma companies are fighting legal …

https://www.washingtonpost.com/…/one-striking-chart…The Washington Post

Jul 13, 2016 – They found that, in the 17 states with a medical-marijuana law in place … only looks at Medicare Part D spending, which applies only to seniors.

New Study Shows Why Big Pharma Hates Medical Marijuana – Slashdot

https://yro.slashdot.org/…/new-study-shows-why-big-pharma-hates-medi&#8230;

Jul 17, 2016 – New Study Shows Why Big Pharma Hates Medical Marijuana ….. they only do it because they are afraid of lost revenue due to legal marijuana?

Medical Marijuana taking a bite out of pharmaceuticals profit.

http://www.18karatreggae.com › Lifestyle

Jul 6, 2016 – Marijuana has already take a big bite out of the profit from other … that medical marijuana is being used as medicine, said senior author W.

Big Pharma’s Attempt at Making Medical Marijuana-based Drugs – Las …

lasvegasreleaf.com/big-pharmas-attempt-making-medical-marijuana-base…

May 24, 2016 – Big Pharma is turning medical marijuana into synthetic… In response, the pharmaceutical industry is looking for a way to make a profit and not …

     And Prop. 64 is bad for everyone, not just sick people! Read the analysis for “recreational users” below from Joe Hemp and pas this e-mail on to as many people as possible!
———- Forwarded message ———-

From: Joe Hemp <420joehemp@gmail.com>

Date: Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 11:26 PM

Subject: 9 MAJOR ISSUES to CONSIDER with PROP 64

To: 

The World of Prop 64: ( lets hope this doesn’t pass)

1 so we can have ONE OUNCE on us in public, but unless we are walking everywhere we go, we can never open it until we get home, unless we open it and smoke it all, as long as we don’t smoke in Public… but then we still cant drive home cause we are supposedly too stoned to drive not to mention driving while in possession of cannabis is still illegal even in a sealed container… Of course having an ounce on our person only serves to limit how much we can transport..Maybe if we have a commuter van that holds 10 people we can transport 10 ounces legally, from point A to point B…again as long as we don’t open it…and as long as it isn’t inside the passenger compartment, cause it’s still a controlled substance.
2. What about the High Times Cannabis Cup or Chalice festivals? they can no longer give away free samples, effectively killing the events…who wants to pay to go to a festival, in the heat, and the dirt, walking around all day for free stickers? no more samples of shatter or flower etc. Maybe we can technically pay a small sampling fee so we aren’t getting a giveaway? Wait there is a limit on how low the price can go, that wont work thanks to prop 64 Price Fixing ( cannot sell at less than cost)….and forget having a cold, over priced beer at any of these events…..no longer allowed.
3. lets not ignore the huge recreational selling point of prop 64…6 plants per property !!! finally i can grow some monsters in my back yard..OH wait it only allows Indoor growing..No problem i’ll just build a greenhouse with plastic sheets…NOPE, accessory structure in most counties means a solid enclosure with a solid roof solid walls and a lockable door, secure from unauthorized entry….Don’t forget the ability of cities and counties to regulate recreational growing, like with a Permit..oops that means they have your name and address…anyone ok with self incrimination at the federal level?
But wait, if there is a statewide law that prohibits outdoor growing, does that mean MEDICAL PATIENTS must also only grow indoors?
4. Cannabis Vaporizers FORBIDDEN except in tobacco zones? Where are the tobacco zones? Who thinks Tobacco will eventually be outlawed completely? And if they outlaw tobacco zones then the fix is in, changes to laws can easily make cannabis use more restrictive with this provision.
5. Mandatory $100 Dollar State ID card to avoid 15% (or more…) tax on Medical Cannabis…So much for the Prop 215 provision that says its voluntary and that a defense in court can be verbal as well as written, lets throw poor patients under the bus with Prop 64…of course the California Medical Assn. stated that ” we need to close the loopholes and wrong diagnoses that allow cannabis for people who are not critically ill” yeah if you cant see the collusion and conspiracy to make cannabis a restricted commodity for big pharma, then you really need to revisit your college textbooks on critical thinking.
6. Delivery services can still be BANNED by cities, but thats ok i can drive it home on my own ( NOT SO FAST… see # 1 Above)
7. LOCAL BANS of ALL TYPES of Licenses is Allowed… The voters do NOT get to decide if they want a ban or not. As we can see recently its all up to the local board of supervisors…. This damages our Prop 215 medical access protections… MMRSA Bans implemented by the state laws undo the Prop 215 protections and are Unconstitutional, so if voters pass this, we are all screwed. (The voters are tricked into destroying the provisions of prop 215) and these Mega Bucks people behind Prop 64 are counting on the uninformed voters to help them set up their monopolies.
8. 15% State Excise Tax PLUS Local Sales Tax PLUS $9.25 per ounce Tax? The black market really loves this high tax rate, and therefore so do the police associations, they get to keep their anti marijuana asset seizure programs in operation because Prop 64 makes sure prohibition and extreme regulations remain in effect, We can’t have cops losing their jobs because we made good Cannabis laws in California now can we?
9. No Warrant needed for Law Enforcement to Inspect ANY Location?
AS YOU CAN SEE, the people who support Prop 64 really havent read it through…
PLEASE FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW…

joe hemp